Iraq Lessons Learned vs the Mainstream Media
I spotted the info listed below here . It was linked on another blog, but I forgot where. If this is all true, its pretty fascinating info. I especially like the part about the NCO from Belton, TX helping to fix the agriculture program. Sometimes as an officer you just have to hide and watch as the NCOs get stuff done.
I don't like point 9 about the "main stream media (MSM)" making to big a deal about the religious factionalism. I'm not doubting the truth to that statement, but I don't like the "MSM" whipping boy either. If this past "year of the blog" has proven anything, then its that there isn't such a thing as a monolithic media. Something new and interesting has emerged and it has empowered smart people to take their ideas to the public. And judging by the number of bloggers who are starting to get published in more established mediums, I'd say that the MSM had started to realize that it has some more talent to tap into.
All you have to do is look at who is getting published to realize that anyone can do it. Take the issue of WIRED that my article appears in. Ana Marie Cox, editor of the blog Wonkette, has a great article about Howard Stearn's migration to satilite radio. Then there is a great piece about podcasting (you think we're just seeing the begining of that?), and then another article about Wikipedia.
Everywhere you look there are examples of people who are smart, have some subject matter expertise, and can write well who are contributing to the so called main stream media. So I'm wondering why our military leadership hasn't jumped on board. If there are leaders in Iraq who don't think that the media is presenting an accurate picture (whether through bias or lack of information/expertise) why aren't they writing more about it?
I'd be willing to bet that if a Army Brigade Commander who just returned from Iraq contacted a publication like the New Yorker or the Atlantic wanting to write about what he/she saw, that publication would jump on the chance. The media wants to tell good stories and they want to hear from people who know what they are talking about. They want unique voices.
So if the MSM isn't doing a perfect job of telling our story, what are we doing to fix it?
Anyway, end of rant. Read below for some interesting lessons learned.
IRAQ--LESSONS LEARNED Here is a fascinating e-mail that is going the rounds in military circles. It is an account of a presentation given by one of the leaders of 1st Cav Div, just back from Iraq. I try to follow Iraq stuff pretty closely, but most of this I had never heard:
1. While units of the Cav served all over Iraq, he spoke mostly of Baghdad and more specifically Sadr City, the big slum on the eastern side of the Tigris River. He pointed out that Baghdad is, in geography, is about the size of Austin. Aus tin has 600,000 to 700,000 people. Baghdad has 6 to7 million people.
2. The Cav lost 28 main battle tanks. He said one of the big lessons learned is that, contrary to docterine going in, M1-A2s and Bradleys are needed, preferred and devastating in urban combat and he is going to make that point to the JCS next week while they are considering downsizing armor.
3. He showed a graph of attacks in Sadr City by month. Last Aug-Sep they were getting up to 160 attacks per week. During the last three months, the graph had flatlined at below 5 to zero per week.
4. His big point was not that they were "winning battles" to do this but that cleaning the place up, electricity, sewage, water were the key factors. He said yes they fought but after they started delivering services that the Iraqis in Sadr City had never had, the terrorist recruiting of 15 and 16 year olds came up empty.
5. The electrical "grid" is a bad, deadly joke. Said that driving down the street in a Hummv with an antenna would short out a whole block of apt. buildings. People do their own wiring and it was not uncommon for early morning patrols would find one or two people lying dead in the street, having been electrocuted trying to re-wire their own homes.
6. Said that not tending to a dead body in the Muslim culture never happens. On election day, after suicide bombers blew themselves up trying to take out polling places, voters would step up to the body lying there, spit on it, and move up in the line to vote.
7. Pointed out that we all heard from the media about the 100 Iraqis killed as they were lined up to enlist in the police and security service. What the media didn't point out was that the next day there 300 lined up in the same place.
8. Said bin Laden and Zarqawi made a HUGE mistake when bin laden went public with naming Zarqawi the "prince" of al Qaeda in Iraq. Said that what the Iraqis saw and heard was a Saudi telling a Jordanian that his job was to kill Iraqis. HUGE mistake. It was one of the biggest factors in getting Iraqis who were on the "fence" to jump off on the side of the coalition and the new gov't.
9. Said the MSM was making a big, and wrong, deal out of the religious sects. Said Iraqis are incredibly nationalistic. They are Iraqis first and then say they are Muslim but the Shi'a - Sunni thing is just not that big a deal to them.
10. After the election the Mayor of Baghdad told him that the people of the region (Middle East) are joyous and the governments are nervous.
11. Said that he did not lose a single tanker truck carrying oil and gas over the roads of Iraq. Think about that. All the attacks we saw on TV with IEDs hitting trucks but he didn't lose one. Why? Army Aviation. Praised his air units and said they made the decision early on that every convoy would have helicopter air cover. Said aviators in that unit were hitting the 1,000 hour mark (sound familiar?). Said a convoy was supposed to head out but stopped at the gates of a compound on the command of an E6. He asked the SSG what the hold up was. E6 said, "Air , sir." He wondered what was wrong with the air, not realizing what the kid was talking about. Then the AH-64s showed up and the E6 said, "That air sir." And then moved out.
12. Said one of the biggest problems was money and regs. There was a $77 million gap between the supplemental budget and what he needed in cash on the ground to get projects started. Said he spent most of his time trying to get money. Said he didn't do much as a "combat commander" because the war he was fighting was a war at the squad and platoon level. Said that his NCOs were winning the war and it was a sight to behold.
13. Said that of all the money appropriated for Iraq, not a cent was earmarked for agriculture. Said that Iraq could feed itself completely and still have food for export but no one thought about it. Said the Cav started working with Texas A&M on ag projects and had special hybrid seeds sent to them through Jordan. TAM analyzed soil samples and worked out how and what to plant. Said he had an E7 from Belton, TX (just down the road from Ft. Hood) who was almost single-handedly rebuilding the ag industry in the Baghdad area.
14. Said he could hire hundreds of Iraqis daily for $7 to $10 a day to work on sewer, electric, water projects, etc. but that the contracting rules from CONUS applied so he had to have $500,000 insurance policies in place in case the workers got hurt. Not kidding. The CONUS peacetime regs slowed everything down, even if they could eventually get waivers for the regs.
2 Comments:
Great artical -I wish the F...... news would tell it like that!!!
who are you kidding. This is part of a speech made by the former commander of the 1st Cavalry Division after returning from Iraq. You ignoramouses missed the whole poinr of the generals speech, which you misquoted. He mainly focused on "nation building" as a role for the military. He admitted that he knows little about warfighting leadership and is more comfortable with urban rehabilitation management missions. His speech, which I have along with references, is not a smart "officer" telling combat tips. It is a damning indictment of US Army generals.
Of all the stupidity...now you guys take the cake!
Post a Comment
<< Home